top of page

User Story Sizing Showdown: Kanban vs. Scrum

Hey there, Agile adventurers! If you've ever wondered how user story sizing differs between Kanban and Scrum, you're in luck! Today, we're diving into the heart of these Agile methodologies to uncover their unique approaches to managing and estimating work. So grab your favorite beverage and get comfy, because we're about to explore the exciting world of user story sizing!

Scrum: Playing the Planning Poker Game

In the Scrum universe, user stories are sized using relative sizing techniques, such as the ever-popular planning poker. Picture your team gathered around, estimating the relative effort needed to complete each story. After some lively discussion and perhaps a few laughs, the team uses these estimates to plan their work for the upcoming sprint. The aim? To determine just how much work the team can tackle within a fixed time period (aka the sprint).

Kanban: Flowing with Lead Time and Cycle Time

Kanban, on the other hand, doesn't prescribe a specific approach to sizing user stories. Instead, this method is all about visualizing and managing the flow of work—no constraints of fixed time periods like sprints here! Rather than estimating the relative effort required for each story, Kanban teams often rely on lead time and cycle time metrics to track the journey of a work item through the system.

This means that user story sizing in Kanban might be a more laid-back affair, with less emphasis on precise estimates than in Scrum. Instead, Kanban teams might prioritize work based on its impact on flow and customer value, adjusting their efforts according to real-time feedback and data.

In a Nutshell: User Story Sizing in Scrum vs. Kanban

While both Scrum and Kanban use user stories to manage work, their approaches to sizing and estimating those stories can differ quite a bit. Scrum is all about estimating the relative effort required to complete stories within a fixed time period, while Kanban is focused on visualizing and managing the flow of work without the constraints of fixed time periods.

So, which approach do you prefer? Are you a planning poker pro or a flow aficionado? Share your experiences and insights into user story sizing in the comments below! Let's learn from each other and continue our Agile journey together!


bottom of page